'Love Through the Ages Essay\r'

'â€Å"It is better to take spot and lost then to have never love at solely.” Edna St. Vincent Millay (1892-1950), a famous poet from the modern period, promulgated â€Å" retire is not all” in 1931, centuries aft(prenominal) â€Å"To My Dear and sweet married troops”, by prude poet Anne Bradstreet (1612-1672), was published in 1678. While comparing these devil poems, one shag pick up many similarities and differences ascribed to the contrasting meter periods they were written.\r\nâ€Å"To My Dear and harming Husband” and â€Å" chicane is not all” be distinguishable in their content and meaning. Although both of the poets are exploring the relationship amongst love and death, they muster up to different results at the halt of their work. Bradstreet finds her love for her husband so worthy when she says, â€Å"I prize thy love more than whole mines of funds”(l.5). On the other hand Millay thinks that she â€Å"might be driv en to sell [his] love for peace,”(l.12). One give notice notice a contrast in bill between the two poems. Bradstreet’s tone is spiritual, sequence Millay’s tone is playful.\r\nThere is one paradox in each of the poems. In â€Å"To My Dear and Loving Husband”, Bradstreet relieves that batch who are no longstanding alive on earth trick be alive forever in heaven. She says, â€Å"that when we live no more, we whitethorn live ever”(l.12). Millay explains that love can’t save lives but people can die without it. This paradox is spread in the freshman six lines of the poem. Although these poems are written in different time periods, they have many similarities considering their content and meaning.\r\nAnn Bradstreet and Edna St. Vincent Millay have different styles. Part of this difference is ascribed to the different time periods in which they lived. In â€Å"To My Dear and Loving Husband” images like gold, debt, and nature are som e that come to reader’s mind, but in â€Å"Love is not all” one can see more images while reading the poem. People hike and sinking, blood, and fractured bones are some of them. The two poems are different in their choice of words too. Millay’s diction is contemporary but Bradstreet’s language is out of date and old fashioned. She uses words and phrases that were common in ordinal century language as when she says, â€Å"Thy love is such I can no way regress” (l.9). Although a regular reader may not notice, both poems have rhyming scheme.\r\nâ€Å"To My Dear and Loving Husband” is written in rhyming couplets, interim â€Å"Love is not all” is written in English or Shakespearean sonnet. The use of metaphoric language is not really noticeable in any of the poems. Bradstreet says, â€Å"My love is such that rivers cannot quench, nor ought but love from thee, give recompense. â€Å", which is the only metaphor she uses in her poe m (l.6). Millay’s most noticeable use of synecdochical language is when she says, â€Å"Yet many a man is making friends with death”, which is a personification (l.7). As explained, the different time periods in which these poems were written causes the great difference in their style.\r\nIf I wanted to carry through a poem close to love, I would draw up about the love of mother for her child. I recollect the mother’s love is the purest and most delightful love. I would include many images showing how a mother cares about her child and how her love is unconditional. I would also use figurative language to explain the love of a mother for her child. I may say how a mother protects her child from all the dangers by comparing it to nature. Or I may use simile to show how desperate a child can be without her mother’s support and care. I would conclude my poem by trying to make the reader believe that people should have more respect and care about their parents and the fact that without them, they would be nothing.\r\n'