Michael Huemer: “America’s Unjust Drug War” Essay

In the essay the Statess Unjust dose War by Michael Huemer, Huemer discusses the facts and opinions around the subject on whether or not the recreational social function of drugs should be banned by law. Huemer believes that the Ameri merchant ship government should not reverse the using up of drugs. He brings up the point on drugs and how they harm the engrossrs and the people in the riding habitrs life he proves that the proscription on drugs in unjust. Huemer believes that drug prohibition is an injustice to Ameri squirts natural honests and questions why people can persucute those who do drugs.The close prominent argument against the handling of drugs is the harm it has on the users. Although drug use is potentially very harmful to the users the government should not be allowed to prohibit people from harming themselves. Many things people regularly take part in are equally as harmful as drug use much(prenominal) as smoking tobacco, drinking alcohol, eating too much , equitation motorcycles, having unprotected or promiscuous sex(Huemer, Para. 5). There is no agency that the government can prohibit all those acts for it is not any of their business. iodin might argue that drug use is more harmful consequently those acts, they would be wrong in most cases because all of those acts lead to destruction which is as harmful as you can get. The Office of National Drug Control Policy claims that drugs kill eighteen super C Americans a twelvemonth while tobacco kills four hundred and forty thousand Americans per year. another(prenominal) relevant statistic is obesity causes up to four hundred and twenty thousand deaths per year. Neither tobacco crazyweedrs nor obese people shake up been punished in so far some(prenominal) drug users are imprisoned. another(prenominal) point prohibitionists suggest against the use of drugs is that drugs harm ones quality of life however many other things harm ones quality of life such as dropping out of high sc hool or on the job(p) at the same job your entire life all of these are choices people puzzle out and the only choice that is persecuted is doing drugs, the others are considered ridiculous to persecute. The gold that drug users use on money is equivalent to those who gamble or spend it on frivolous things leaving both lives at littler quality, merely the drug users are persecuted. Although the use of drugs has the same affects on other peoples life choices drug users are persecuted and people who make equally life-threatening choices are left to make those choices with no persecutions.Another argument against the use of drugs is the harm it potentially has against the people around the users. race around drug users do have the potential to be harmed from them yet so do many other things driving could potentially lessened people and many other things, yet anyone who has a license can drive a vehicle without being persecuted. Every choice in life has risks of hurting people ye t the only one choice is persecuted drugs. Although it seems absurd to punish people for being inconsiderate or make not so good choices the outcome of their choices on the public are similar to drug users.If drugs are truly unjust hence America has over four hundred and fifty thousand people in jail unjustly. They are not just being punished for no reason they are being punished for exercising their mature as a human, making their own choices. Everyone has the right to demand to do drugs or not to do them. If there was a drug that took away the users license to make choices or to attack and hurt other people then the government could step in and help, however no drug exists that have that effects on people. The thought supporting that it is a human right to choose to do drugs comes from the idea that everyone owns their own body. So a individual can make any choice as what they can do to their body, harmful or not. An example of this can be seen in the cleaning womans right to have or not have an abortion. roughly people believe it is the womans choice because it is her body besides others believe she should not be allowed to because it hurts the fetus, which is potentially a live human. or so people support the belief that people have the right to choose what the do to their body however with this right you may not use their body to harm others. Prohibitionists argue that drug use is not ones right over their body because the drugs are making the choices and not the person freely, mayhap it is not their fault they have abused drugs it could have been psychological exigency or something similar. It is still unjust to persecute these people because they are not morally responsible for that choice. However if users do freely decide to use drugs then they are exercising their rights and the government has no right to interfere. boilers suit Huemer looks at all the prohibitionists arguments that could be thought of and disproves their belief on the law s against drug use. Huemer believes it is a human right to choose to do drugs just as it is to eat whatever food you choose even if it makes you obese, or smoke as many cigarettes a day even though you leave alone probably die, and the choice to have an abortion. With life you have many choices you can make and with that choice comes the chance of hurting yourself either physically or mentally as well as people that surround you. In conclusion Huemer fully disagrees with the prohibits on the use of drugs in America with his belief that the persecutions are fully unjust as well as insensate with many people in jail because they chose to use drugs.