Pow 12 Imp 1

1. To find my oddments I had to count about each breach of the problem. When you know that one thing means you go on to the conterminous part. When you figure out what that means you have to see how the two educations argon related. If they atomic number 18 related then you can deduce a conclusion that makes sense. 2. here ar my conclusions for the 6 problems on page 7. 1. a. No medical specialty is nice b. Senna is a cargon for Here I deduced that Senna is not a nice medicine. I think this because the initial statement says that no medicine is nice. That tells me that all medicines atomic number 18 not nice.The second statement says Senna is a medicine. That statement is straight forward. When you depute them to sether you can decide that Senna is a medicine and medicines be not nice. So Senna is not nice. 2. a. All shillings be round b. These coins are round Here I dogged that no now conclusions can be drawn. The first statement says All shillings are round. Tha t statement is clear. The second statement says These coins are round. This tells you the coin they have are round. When you put these statements together you can see some flaws.They say these coins scarcely you dont know if any of these coins are shillings. They can be other coins that are round. So you cannot deduce anything. These coins are 3. a. advantageously-nigh pigs are wild b. All pigs are fat Here I decided that there are no conclusions that can be made. The first statement tells you that some pigs are wild and the second tells you that all pigs are fat. merely when you put these statements together you get wild pigs are fat only you already know that because the second statement says that all pigs are fat. thence you cannot deduce anything. . a. Prejudiced persons are untrustworthy b. Some unprejudiced persons are disliked Here there are no conclusions that can be made. These statements are just statements are just statements and you cannot deduce anything from the m. If you combine these statements you get prejudice persons are untrustworthy and some are disliked. 5. a. Babies are split b. Nobody who is despised can manage a crocodile c. Illogical persons are despised Here I deduce that Babies cannot manage a crocodile. The first statement says that Babies are illogical.The third statement says that illogical persons are despised. When you put those statement together you get babies are despised. and so you have to serve at the second statement. Nobody who is despised can manage a crocodile. So when you put those statements together you get babies cannot manage a crocodile. 6. a. No birds, except ostriches, are 9 feet tall b. There are no birds in the bird sanctuary that belong to anyone but me c. No ostrich lives on mince pies d. I have no birds slight that 9 feet tall. Here I deduced that the birds in the aviary are ostriches and they do not give mince pies..To deduce this I combined the third and fourth statements. unneurotic it say s that no birds less than 9 feet tall are in the aviary. Then when you combine that statement with the fourth statement you deduce that the birds in the aviary are ostriches. And when you conclude the third statement you get a last-place statement that says the birds in the aviary are ostriches and they do not feed in mince pies. Part Two Valid Conclusion People with hats are untrustworthy Untrustworthy people are dangerous. Invalid Conclusion Some Golden Retrievers are gold These dogs are gold 3.This POW has to do with mathematics because it is all about logic. In math without logic you would less successful then if you do have logic. If something does not seem slump to you or is confusing you are using logic to realize that something is do by and give use it to solve it. Without logic you wouldnt know when something is make up or wrong. 4. This POW was fairly simple. But some of the problems required you to think more than others. But if you think it out in steps you will be able to solve them easily. I believe that I did well and thought out each problem as well as I can.